MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981242874 · doi:10.1080/02786826.2019.1676394

Chemical and microphysical properties of wind-blown dust near an actively retreating glacier in Yukon, Canada

2019· article· en· W2981242874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerosol Science and Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineral dustParticulatesDeposition (geology)AerosolEnvironmental scienceRadiative forcingAtmospheric sciencesAeolian processesEnvironmental chemistryAir quality indexBiogeochemical cycleChemistryGeologySedimentMeteorologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne mineral aerosols emitted in high-latitude regions can impact radiative forcing, biogeochemical cycling of metals, and local air quality. The impact of dust emissions in these regions may change rapidly, as warming temperatures can increase mineral dust production and source regions. As there exists little research on mineral dust emissions in high-latitude regions, we have performed the first study of the physico-chemical properties of mineral dust emitted from a sub-Arctic proglacial dust source, using a method tailored to the remote conditions of the Canadian North. Soil and aerosol samples (PM10 and deposited mineral dust) were collected in May 2018 near the Ä’äy Chù (Slims River), a site exhibiting strong dust emissions. WHO air quality thresholds were exceeded at several receptor sites near the dust source, indicating a negative impact on local air quality. Notably, temporally averaged particle size distributions of PM10 were very fine as compared to those measured at more well-characterized, low-latitude dust sources. In addition, mineralogy and elemental composition of ambient PM10 were characterized; PM10 elemental composition was enriched in trace elements as compared to dust deposition, bulk soil samples, and the fine soil fractions (d < 53 µm). Finally, through a comparison of the elemental composition of PM10, dust deposition, and both fine and bulk soil fractions, as well as of meteorological factors measured during our campaign, we propose that the primary mechanisms for dust emissions from the Ä’äy Chù Valley are the rupture of clay coatings on particles and/or the release of resident fine particulate matter.Copyright © 2019 American Association for Aerosol Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it