MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981508170 · doi:10.1109/tgcn.2019.2949288

Frameworks for Energy Efficiency Maximization in HetNets With Millimeter Wave Backhaul Links

2019· article· en· W2981508170 on OpenAlexafffund
Sylvester Aboagye, Ahmed Ibrahim, Telex M. N. Ngatched

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Heterogeneous networkComputer scienceComputer networkThroughputEfficient energy useConvex optimizationWirelessBase stationWireless networkEngineeringTelecommunicationsRegular polygonElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterogeneous networks (HetNets) and millimeter wave (mmWave) communications have been recognized as two of the most promising techniques for future cellular networks. HetNets possess the ability to significantly increase network capacity and coverage, while the mmWave bands have an abundant spectrum to support gigabit-per-second data transmission for backhauling. Due to the extreme pathloss and the unreliable transmission of mmWave signals over longer distances, multi-hop mmWave transmissions have been identified as a backhaul (BH) solution in HetNets. On the other hand, energy efficiency (EE) has been identified as a prime design factor for cellular networks because of their rising energy costs. In this paper, two optimization frameworks for maximizing the EE of HetNets with multi-hop mmWave BH links are explored. The first framework, referred to as joint EE, power, and flow control (JEEPF), considers enforcing a strict throughput requirement on all user equipment (UEs) and maximizing the network EE via the joint optimization of power and BH flows. The second framework, referred to as joint EE, power, flow, and throughput (JEEPFT), allows an acceptable range of throughput requirements for each UE and maximizes the network EE via the joint optimization of power, BH flows, and UEs' achievable throughputs. It is observed that this little change (i.e., strict vs. an acceptable range of throughput requirements) causes a drastic difference in the formulations of both problems. The JEEPF simplifies to power minimization problem (which is convex), while the JEEPFT is a ratio of throughput to power (which is fractional and non-convex). Two solution techniques that obtain the optimal solution are proposed for the JEEPFT optimization framework. Simulation results are used to demonstrate the superiority of the JEEPFT framework over the JEEPF and other simple benchmark schemes. The computational complexity of the JEEPFT solution techniques is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and NetworkingSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207