MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982156495 · doi:10.3138/seminar.55.4.4

Appropriations, Creative Subversions, and Conversations: The <i>Indianer</i> in Contemporary Germany and the Double Entendre of Re-enactment

2019· article· en· W2982156495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Studies and Postmodernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousWitnessMythologySimulacrumConversationGermanSociologyTribeSpace (punctuation)ExoticismAnthropologyHistoryLiteratureGender studiesArt historyArtAestheticsPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article will contextualize Indianthusiasm in a contemporary setting. While the German fascination with Indigenous cultures is hardly new, Indigenous engagement with and critique of the Winnetou phenomenon in the past ten years has produced a space of indictment and, more important, a space for conversation. Writers and artists such as Drew Hayden Taylor, Bear Witness from A Tribe Called Red, and others have engaged with the Indianer image as they employ Gerald Vizenor’s concept of Native survivance. In dealing with a simulacrum of Indigeneity, these artists engage with a myth with decidedly little Indigenous content, from a nation known primarily as armchair colonialists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it