MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982156495 · doi:10.3138/seminar.55.4.4

Appropriations, Creative Subversions, and Conversations: The <i>Indianer</i> in Contemporary Germany and the Double Entendre of Re-enactment

2019· article· en· W2982156495 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicole Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Studies and Postmodernism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousWitnessMythologySimulacrumConversationGermanSociologyTribeSpace (punctuation)ExoticismAnthropologyHistoryLiteratureGender studiesArt historyArtAestheticsPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article will contextualize Indianthusiasm in a contemporary setting. While the German fascination with Indigenous cultures is hardly new, Indigenous engagement with and critique of the Winnetou phenomenon in the past ten years has produced a space of indictment and, more important, a space for conversation. Writers and artists such as Drew Hayden Taylor, Bear Witness from A Tribe Called Red, and others have engaged with the Indianer image as they employ Gerald Vizenor’s concept of Native survivance. In dealing with a simulacrum of Indigeneity, these artists engage with a myth with decidedly little Indigenous content, from a nation known primarily as armchair colonialists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.042
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicCultural Studies and PostmodernismFrench-language works237,207