MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982368722 · doi:10.1520/jte20190269

Modeling Lane-Change Risk in Urban Expressway Off-Ramp Area Based on Naturalistic Driving Data

2019· article· en· W2982368722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Testing and Evaluation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Off-ramp areas are considered the critical sections of urban expressways where the exiting vehicles and straight-through vehicles merge. Therefore, lane-change behaviors frequently occur at the upstream of the urban expressway off-ramp, which lead to high chance of traffic crashes. This study looks at the risk of lane-change behaviors in the multilane urban expressway off-ramp areas. First, lane-change process information of exit vehicles in urban expressway off-ramp area was extracted from the Shanghai Naturalistic Driving Study (SH-NDS) database. Second, for each lane-change movements of exit vehicles, a risk evaluation indicator (risk perception, RP) was adopted to quantify the lane-change risk. Based on the RP, the study proposed a four-rank risk classification criterion using K-means clustering to define the risk rank of each lane-change movement. Finally, a lane-change risk rank classification model was developed for traffic in the off-ramp areas of multilane expressways using four distinctive influencing factors. Four influencing factors, namely, traffic congestion level, demand lane change times, lane-change direction, and relative distance between vehicle and exit, were used to describe the traffic flow characteristics and exiting lane-change route for the modeling purpose. The risk model was developed using two support vector machine models, which were based on the partial binary tree structure and the directed acyclic graph structure, respectively. The results showed that the overall accuracy of the partial binary tree structure classifier was 65.71 % and the average AUC value was 0.9004, both of which shows a better performance of the partial binary tree structure classifier, compared with the directed acyclic graph structure classifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it