Investigation of Aluminium and Copper Wound PMSM for Direct–drive Electric Vehicle Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates aluminium and copper windings for a permanent magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) developed for direct–drive electric vehicle (EV) application. Previously, studies have been conducted on comparison of these windings in terms of thermal and electrical conductivity, cost and mass density. However, the impact of these windings on the machine’s performance in terms of efficiency and torque has not been analysed. In this paper, for the same machine volume and geometry, a comparative analysis of PMSMs with copper and aluminium windings has been performed in terms of efficiency, torque, weight, operating speed range, ohmic losses and temperatures. Furthermore, as these machines are developed for direct–drive EV application, drive–cycle-based analysis was conducted for urban and highway cycles for a 2013 Ford Focus vehicle dynamics model. For these drive cycles, analysis in terms of torque speed characteristics and maximum energy density efficiency for both the machines has been performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it