MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982733429 · doi:10.19043/ipdj.92.004

Microsystems culture change: a refined theory for developing person-centred, safe and effective workplaces based on strategies that embed a safety culture

2019· article· en· W2982733429 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Manley, Carolyn Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Practice Development Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCulture changeSafety cultureOrganizational cultureComputer scienceBusinessPsychologySociologyPublic relationsManagementPolitical scienceSocial scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Attending to culture is central to developing workplaces that are safe and effective – those that prioritise learning to support continuing quality, person-centred relationships and the wellbeing of providers and recipients of care. Culture at the microsystems level, where care is experienced and provided, directly impacts on staff and patients but is generally given much less attention than organisational cultures at the meso level. This paper presents a refinement of a previously published middle-range theory of culture change derived from a concept analysis of effective workplace culture. It draws on findings from a project that set out to embed a safety culture and grow quality improvement and leadership capability through a regional patient safety initiative in frontline teams across four acute NHS hospital trusts in south-east England. Aims and objectives: To refine theoretical understanding about how to recognise and develop effective workplace cultures at the microsystems level based on practical insights from the Safety Culture Quality Improvement Realist Evaluation (SCQIRE) project. Methods: The evaluation approach for the SCQIRE project combined realist evaluation and practice development methodology. Realist evaluation was selected to answer the question ‘what works for whom and why when embedding a safety culture, improvement capability and leadership in frontline teams?’ Key to this approach is the local development, testing and refinement of ‘CMO’ relationships between: contexts (C); mechanisms, for example triggers and explaining why components work (M); and outcomes (O). Drawing on project data, the enablers, attributes and consequences of an effective workplace culture have been used to critically examine the factors that contributed to frontline teams’ ability to create and sustain a safety culture. Findings: A total of 24 CMO relationships resulted in four emerging programme theories that described what worked, why and for whom in relation to: 1) frontline teams developing their safety culture; 2) facilitators working with frontline teams to embed safety culture, quality improvement and leadership; 3) organisations supporting frontline teams; and 4) the patient safety collaborative initiative. Conclusions: It is concluded that the close relationship between person-centred values, ways of working and continuing effectiveness mean it is not possible to develop a safety culture without also being person-centred in relationships. Other theoretical refinements proposed include greateremphasis on the role of appreciative active learning, person-centredness in everyday relationships and an integrated approach to learning, development and improvement embedded at both micro and meso levels. The theory strengthens individual enablers of safety culture, with particular attention given to quality clinical leadership based on an inclusive, participative, collaborative approach involving all stakeholders, and to facilitation that embraces all the skills required for learning, developing and improving with person-centred values. Organisational enablers emphasise the need for a corporate body of facilitators to support frontline teams, as well as the role of senior organisational leaders in enabling a bottom-up approach to supporting quality and innovation. Implications for practice: • Safety and person-centred values are interdependent with ways of working in relationships and ongoing team effectiveness. None of these can be considered without the others • Investment in quality clinical leadership is essential for the development of high-performing teams, safety culture, achievement of shared meanings and direction, and valuing of engagement of both staff and patients • Facilitators supporting frontline teams require corporate support and a wide range of skills including leadership, the ability to promote engagement in co-creating meaning, and appreciative learning that draws on the workplace as a powerful resource • Senior organisational leaders need to model organisational values in every situation but also be skilled at enabling frontline teams to become empowered through supporting a bottom-up approach to innovation and change

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.025
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Practice Development JournalSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207