MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983449145 · doi:10.1164/rccm.201905-1017oc

Genome-Wide Association Study of Susceptibility to Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

2019· article· en· W2983449145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversité LavalSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of LeicesterAsthma and Lung UKNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBritish Lung FoundationNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research CentreMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesMichael Smith Health Research BCInstituto Tecnológico y de Energías RenovablesEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionBroad InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesWellcome TrustNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisGenome-wide association studyMedicineGenetic associationGenetic predispositionLung cancerGeneLungDiseaseGeneticsBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismPathologyGenotypeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a complex lung disease characterized by scarring of the lung that is believed to result from an atypical response to injury of the epithelium. Genome-wide association studies have reported signals of association implicating multiple pathways including host defense, telomere maintenance, signaling, and cell–cell adhesion. Objectives To improve our understanding of factors that increase IPF susceptibility by identifying previously unreported genetic associations. Methods We conducted genome-wide analyses across three independent studies and meta-analyzed these results to generate the largest genome-wide association study of IPF to date (2,668 IPF cases and 8,591 controls). We performed replication in two independent studies (1,456 IPF cases and 11,874 controls) and functional analyses (including statistical fine-mapping, investigations into gene expression, and testing for enrichment of IPF susceptibility signals in regulatory regions) to determine putatively causal genes. Polygenic risk scores were used to assess the collective effect of variants not reported as associated with IPF. Measurements and Main Results We identified and replicated three new genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10−8) signals of association with IPF susceptibility (associated with altered gene expression of KIF15, MAD1L1, and DEPTOR) and confirmed associations at 11 previously reported loci. Polygenic risk score analyses showed that the combined effect of many thousands of as yet unreported IPF susceptibility variants contribute to IPF susceptibility. Conclusions The observation that decreased DEPTOR expression associates with increased susceptibility to IPF supports recent studies demonstrating the importance of mTOR signaling in lung fibrosis. New signals of association implicating KIF15 and MAD1L1 suggest a possible role of mitotic spindle-assembly genes in IPF susceptibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it