Analyzing and Leveraging Remote-Core Bandwidth for Enhanced Performance in GPUs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bandwidth achieved from local/shared caches and memory is a major performance determinant in Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). These existing sources of bandwidth are often not enough for optimal GPU performance. Therefore, to enhance the performance further, we focus on efficiently unlocking an additional potential source of bandwidth, which we call as remote-core bandwidth. The source of this bandwidth is based on the observation that a fraction of data (i.e., L1 read misses) required by one GPU core can also be found in the local (L1) caches of other GPU cores. In this paper, we propose to efficiently coordinate the data movement across cores in GPUs to exploit this remote-core bandwidth. However, we find that its efficient detection and utilization presents several challenges. To this end, we specifically address: a) which data is shared across cores, b) which cores have the shared data, and c) how we can get the data as soon as possible. Our extensive evaluation across a wide set of GPGPU applications shows that significant performance improvement can be achieved at a modest hardware cost on account of the additional bandwidth received from the remote cores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".