MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep neural networks for 1D impedance inversion

2019· article· en· W2985514430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsBentley (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkSynthetic dataAlgorithmSeismic inversionDeep neural networksNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceData miningGeologyMathematicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryWe investigate the applicability of different types of deep neural networks for the estimation of subsurface properties from seismic data. The pre-trained networks can predict velocity models from new data in a few milliseconds, which makes this data-driven approach especially important for multidimensional inversion, where conventional methods inversion methods suffer from large computational cost. At the same time, realistic one-dimensional models such as the 160-layer velocity model used as an example in this study require large synthetic datasets for training, which are not always possible to obtain. Hence, we also study the impact of extending the training data by adding random noise to the modelled examples. We observe that enlarging training datasets by adding synthetic noise to existing samples improves the quality of inversion without a significant increase in computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it