MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985533496 · doi:10.1109/tie.2019.2949542

Early Classification of Alarm Floods via Exponentially Attenuated Component Analysis

2019· article· en· W2985533496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsALARMFlood mythBenchmark (surveying)Component (thermodynamics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Support vector machineExponential growthArtificial intelligenceData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Real-time computingEngineeringMathematicsGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For industrial monitoring systems, early classification of alarm floods can provide valuable information for efficient alarm management. With the observation that the majority of earlier triggered alarms usually play more important roles in a single alarm flood, a classification method called exponentially attenuated component analysis (EACA) is proposed in this article. Each alarm flood can be extracted as a binary vector, while the information of relative triggering times is embedded in the form of exponential attenuation. With higher weights assigned to earlier alarms, EACA is predisposed to generate satisfactory classification even in the early stage of an alarm flood. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using the benchmark Tennessee Eastman process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it