Safe Coverage of Compact Domains For Second Order Dynamical Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autonomous systems operating in close proximity with each other to cover a specified area has many potential applications, but to achieve effective coordination, two key challenges need to be addressed: coordination and safety. For coordination, we propose a locally asymptotically stable distributed coverage controller for compact domains in the plane and homogeneous vehicles modeled with second order dynamics with bounded input forces. This control policy is based on artificial potentials designed to enforce desired vehicle-domain and inter-vehicle separations, and can be applied to arbitrary compact domains including non-convex ones. We prove, using Lyapunov theory, that certain coverage configurations are locally asymptotically stable. For safety, we utilize Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability theory to guarantee pairwise collision avoidance. Rather than computing numerical solutions of the associated HJ partial differential equation as is typically done, we derive an analytical solution for our second-order vehicle model. This provides an exact, global solution rather than an approximate, local one within some computational domain. In addition to considerably reducing collision count, the collision avoidance controller also reduces oscillatory behaviour of vehicles, helping the system reach steady state faster. We demonstrate our approach in three representative simulations involving a square domain, triangle domain, and a non-convex moving domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it