MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2989372335 · doi:10.1109/tc.2019.2953751

Approximate Restoring Dividers Using Inexact Cells and Estimation From Partial Remainders

2019· article· en· W2989372335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmArithmeticApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximate computing can be used in error-resilient applications to reduce power consumption and increase overall circuit performance. This article introduces two approximate dividers with restoring array-based architecture that achieve substantial hardware savings while maintaining high accuracy when compared to existing approximate designs. The first design replaces exact restoring divider cells with a proposed approximate cell in a column-wise fashion. The second design uses several rows of exact architecture to compute a partial remainder and then rounds and encodes the divisor and this partial remainder so that they may be used to express approximate outputs. A comprehensive accuracy and performance evaluation are performed for the proposed dividers as well as other state-of-the-art designs. When compared to an exact design, the proposed dividers have a reduced area and power consumption of 46 and 57 percent respectively while introducing minimal error. Furthermore, the trade-off between accuracy and improved performance is explored for various approximate dividers in order to determine which designs achieve the best compromise. The accuracy of the proposed dividers is then demonstrated using two image processing applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it