MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development and Validation of Salbutamol, Bromhexine, Ambroxol and Guauaifenesin Determination in Human Plasma by HPLC-MS/MS Method

2019· article· en· W2989685308 on OpenAlexaff
Т. Н. Комаров, D. S. Bogdanova, O. A. Miskiv, A. V. Aleshina, I. E. Shohin, Yu. V. Medvedev, N. S. Bagaevа, I. M. Korenskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug development & registration · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsCanadian Public Health Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbroxolChromatographyChemistrySalbutamolPharmacokineticsBioequivalenceHigh-performance liquid chromatographySolid phase extractionPharmacologyMedicineAnesthesiaAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Multicomponent oral drugs containing salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin have a mucolytic, expectorant and bronchodilator effect. The development method for determination substances in biological fluids is a main procedure for performing the analytical part of pharmacokinetic studies and bioequivalence studies of multicomponent drugs. There is no published data of the determination of bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin, but there a lot of published methods for divided determination analytes in a biological fluid. This study presents the development and validation of a method of the determination of salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin in human blood plasma by high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. A sample preparation was perfomed by solid-phase extraction. Deuterated derivatives were used as internal standards. Aim. The aim of the study is to develop a method for the quantitative determination of salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin in human plasma by HPLC with tandem mass spectrometric detection for performing the analytical part of pharmacokinetic studies. Materials and methods. Determination of salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin in human plasma by HPLC with tandem mass spectrometric detection. A sample was prepared using solid-phase extraction. Results and discussion. The method was validated by next validation parameters: selectivity, matrix effect, calibration curve, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, carry-over and stability. Conclusion. The method of the determination of salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin in human plasma was developed and validated by HPLC-MS/MS. The analytical range of the was 0.1–20 ng/mL in plasma for salbutamol, 0.25–25 ng/mL in plasma for bromhexine, 0.075–3 ng/mL in plasma for ambroxol, and 10–2000 ng/mL in plasma for guaifenesin. Method could be applied to determination of salbutamol, bromhexine, ambroxol and guaifenesin in plasma for PK and BE studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug development & registrationSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207