MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990130261 · doi:10.1289/isee.2011.00980

DEVELOPING A LAND USE REGRESSION MODEL FOR ULTRAFINE PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS IN VANCOUVER, CANADA

2011· article· en· W2990130261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrafine particleEnvironmental scienceParticle numberPopulation densityLinear regressionAir pollutionPopulationRange (aeronautics)Spatial variabilityAtmospheric sciencesStatisticsMeteorologyGeographyEnvironmental healthMedicineMathematicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Epidemiologic studies have associated adverse health outcomes with exposure to traffic-related air pollutants, principally NO2, at levels below those showing effects in controlled exposure studies. (1) This suggests the importance of related contaminants in the traffic exhaust mixture such as ultrafine particles (UFP) (<0.1µm in diameter). Presently, no routine monitoring for UFP exists in North America and little information is available regarding UFP spatial distribution.We measured particle number concentrations (PNC) in Vancouver to develop a land use regression (LUR) model for use in epidemiologic studies and to identify important factors influencing concentrations. Methods: During a three-week sampling period in spring 2010, PNC were measured with portable condensation particle counters (CPC3007, TSI®, Shoreview, MN) for one hour at eighty locations previously used to characterize spatial variability in nitrogen oxides. PNC was measured continuously at four additional locations to assess temporal variation. LUR modeling was conducted using geographic predictors, including: road length, vehicle density, intersection and bus stop density, land use type, fast food restaurant density, population density and elevation. Results: The range of measured (one-hour median) PNC values was highly variable, 1500 -105000 particles/cm3, (mean [SD] = 18200 [15900] particles/cm3). Pearson correlations of PNC with two-week average NO, NO2 and NOx concentrations at the same sites were 0.59, 0.61 and 0.65. A preliminary LUR model (R2= 0.44) for temporally-adjusted PNC included ln-distance to nearest major road, area of industrial land within a 750m radius and density of bus stops within 100m. Conclusions: Measured PNC was highly correlated with measured nitrogen oxides. However, geographic predictors explained a smaller proportion of variability in PNC levels than found previously for nitrogen oxides, suggesting some common sources and additional unknown factors accounting for PNC spatial variability. (2) A subsequent UFP LUR model will incorporate wind speed and direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it