MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990349872 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.4433

Risk of bladder and kidney cancer from exposure to low levels of arsenic in drinking water, Nova Scotia – Canada

2016· article· en· W2990349872 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaCancer Care OntarioHealth CanadaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder cancerMedicineEnvironmental healthKidney cancerCancerDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Arsenic (As) in drinking water affects the health of hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Although West Bengal, Bangladesh and Taiwan are among the most affected regions, with As concentration as high as 4,700 μg/L and where levels >300 μg/L are common, As contamination of well water is also prevalent across the US and Canada. Studies of populations exposed to such high levels show strong associations and dose-response relationships with As in drinking water and a wide range of illness, including, skin, lung, bladder, and kidney cancer. The threshold at which these diseases develop is uncertain at lower levels of exposure. Recent evidence suggests possible health effects at levels as low as 10 μg/L, current World Health Organization advisory limit. This study models the risk of developing bladder/kidney cancer in those exposed to As around current guideline levels. Methods: A Bayesian spatial autoregressive model was used to model risk at 3 levels of As exposure (0–2 μg/L; 2–5 μg/L; >5 μg/L—based on 10,498 private well samples) in 864 bladder and 525 kidney cancer cases diagnosed in Nova Scotia Canada, between 1998-2010. The model accounted for spatial dependencies and included covariates (e.g. smoking proxies). Results: The risk of developing bladder cancer (both sex) was on average 16 % (2–5 µg/L) and 18 % (> 5 µg/L) greater than that of the referent group (< 2 µg/L), with associated posterior probabilities of 0.88 and 0.93 for these risks being greater than the reference rate. Effect sizes for kidney cancer were lower; the risk being on average 5 % (2–5 µg/L) and 14 % (> 5 µg/L) greater than that of the referent group, with associated probabilities of 0.66 and 0.87. Stratified analyses by sex, showed larger posterior probabilities for an increased risk amongst males– a result likely due to low female case counts. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for health effects at low level of As exposure in drinking water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it