Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses cross-domain visual search, where visual queries retrieve category samples from a different domain. For example, we may want to sketch an airplane and retrieve photographs of airplanes. Despite considerable progress, the search occurs in a closed setting between two pre-defined domains. In this paper, we make the step towards an open setting where multiple visual domains are available. This notably translates into a search between any pair of domains, from a combination of domains or within multiple domains. We introduce a simple – yet effective – approach. We formulate the search as a mapping from every visual domain to a common semantic space, where categories are represented by hyperspherical prototypes. Open cross-domain visual search is then performed by searching in the common semantic space, regardless of which domains are used as source or target. Domains are combined in the common space to search from or within multiple domains simultaneously. A separate training of every domain-specific mapping function enables an efficient scaling to any number of domains without affecting the search performance. We empirically illustrate our capability to perform open cross-domain visual search in three different scenarios. Our approach is competitive with respect to existing closed settings, where we obtain state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks for three sketch-based search tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".