MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991719036

The Opposite of Cold: The Northwoods Finnish Sauna Tradition

2013· article· en· W2991719036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David J. Puglia

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial culture · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryTributeDemographyArchaeologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Opposite of Cold: The Northwoods Finnish Tradition By Michael Nordskog Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ix + 187 pp. Acknowledgements, notes, and index. $34.95, ISBN 0816656827.Reviewed by David J. Puglia, dpuglia@psu.edu, American Studies Program, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057No matter where Finns go, they bring their tradition with them. Indeed, Arnold R. Alanen refers to in his introduction as the sign of (p. xi). Finns and their tradition had been present in eastern colonies since early seventeenth century, but their wood saunas have unfortunately been erased from landscape by unforgiving climate. Between 1864 and 1914, an additional 300,000 Finns immigrated to Upper Midwest. They made their homes - and their saunas - in Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Ontario, an area similar to their native climate and now known as sauna belt. Some of these original saunas survive to this day, and as tradition lives, new saunas continue to be built by subsequent generations. Up to 1960s, ninety percent of Finnish families owned a sauna. Those who didn't found their way to public saunas for ten to twenty cents a steam.This beautifully photographed book promises to be a fitting tribute to great tradition of Northern Minnesota. For non-Upper Midwesterners unfamiliar with traditional Finnish sauna, this is distinctly different from funky room next to hotel pool (p. 1). Pronounced like Carl Sauer - does not rhyme with fauna. The typical is 20 by 10 feet, single entry, two rooms, with a chimney, and often near a body of water. From arrival of Finn in nineteenth century, tradition has endured. The premise of book is that saunas are first building built by Finns in a new land, remain central to Finnish-American lives, and continue, despite modernization, to be important to this day. The implicit argument is that because of importance in FinnishAmerican lives, we can learn more about Finnish-Americans by documenting, researching, and analyzing how saunas interweave with and structure FinnishAmerican lives. Therefore, because saunas are such an important and ubiquitous part of Finnish-American heritage, documentation, preservation, and continuation of tradition should be encouraged.Michael Nordskog espouses a general theory of Finnish-American progression in United States. As Finnish-American families improved their financial circumstances, they would concomitantly improve their sauna. At their most destitute, served also as a single room log cabin, housing family through harsh winters. With time and good fortune, a family could rise, pinnacle today being a chic, professionally designed lakeside sauna. The method here is primarily oriented toward family research, oral history, and dramatic photography, book being light on measuring and other advanced architectural research methods. The author also consults pivotal Finnish literature like The Kakvala and Seven Brothers to assess role plays in them. Crosscultural comparison is never lacking, author always taking into account both Finnish and Finnish-American tradition.The book consists of eight parts, all original, by four contributors. The foreword is written by David Salmela, a Minnesota architect who grew up in tradition and now designs award-winning saunas. The introduction, written by professor emeritus of landscape architecture at University of Wisconsin Arnold R. Alanen, presents as both a long-standing and invented Finnish tradition that has been popularized, modernized, and Americanized in nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries. Sauna in New World is essentially a third introduction, this one by Michael Nordskog, author of remaining chapters, who lays out what a is and where they can be found. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial cultureSame topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207