MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992114457

The Return of Return-on-Equity: Double-Digit Profits Are Possible, but Only with Fundamental Change

2009· article· en· W2992114457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueABA banking journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessEquity (law)Retail bankingProfit (economics)MarketingCompetition (biology)FinanceCommerceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] With pre-tax return on equity hovering at around 5% for banks nowadays, those lofty average returns of 26% they achieved only two years ago seem like a distant memory. While such spectacular performance may not be in the cards anytime soon, given low-growth expectations and a reshuffled market and regulatory environment, we believe an ROE of 15% by 2012 is eminently achievable for banks that fundamentally change the way they've been doing business. Among the most important changes: boosting capital efficiency; transforming credit quality; implementing proactive risk management; and achieving cost efficiencies across the enterprise. But the drive toward double-digit ROE will require leaders to undertake even more complex changes and make major strategic investments that go to the core of a bank's business proposition. Large retail banks will need to broadly rationalize their businesses. They must identify and implement new profit pools, innovate, and learn how to stave off new competition from trusted community banks and credit unions as well as foreign entrants, and perhaps even well-liked consumer brands, such as Wal-Mart or McDonalds. In the United Kingdom, for example, Tesco, one of the world's largest supermarket chains, is expanding rapidly into banking. Another emerging threat is low-cost online banking players like Ally Bank (GMAC's online bank) that can capture customers' deposits at a much lower cost than traditional providers. Most importantly, larger banks need to restore severely shaken customer confidence and embrace customer strategies that rely far less on traditional branch banking. And all banks will need to cast a wider net for potential customers through the online channel where, it is estimated, opening a new account costs pennies compared with over $50 to open one in person. To understand the scale of transformation that is required, Accenture conducted a survey this spring (www.accenture.com/ banking2012news) consisting of interviews with leaders of banks and private equity firms as well as equity analysts. We also analyzed and modelled the fundamentals of more than 150 banks, validating the results with clients. Our findings lead to the inescapable conclusion: from now on, only bold moves will do. Look for fewer banks Local and regional consolidation will result in significantly fewer banks of all sizes. In the U.S. for instance, the number of banks could conceivably be slashed from over 8,000 to 6,000 in just a few years due to inadequate capital to offset losses, lack of growth, and increased costs. Smaller and regional banks, particularly those with footprints in hard-hit economic areas and with high concentrations of commercial real-estate loans, are at the highest risk of failure. But for some select banks, consolidation represents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for prudent and cost-effective growth. Profitable well-capitalized U.S. banks and enterprising foreign institutions, including Canadian, Spanish, Brazilian, and Japanese banks, will seek opportunities to expand at bargain-basement prices--free of the costs and restrictions of TARP-type rescue terms and strengthened by government down-side protection. The financial crisis has also taken a toll on the ability of many banks to maintain their international footprints. Some surviving multi-regional universal banks will continue to do business globally, but there will be far fewer of them. A handful of players, like HSBC and Santander, will be able to operate with truly simplified global operating models providing differentiated opportunities for efficient revenue growth. Others will focus on becoming global specialists--in wealth management, consumer finance, transaction banking, and investment banking--or they will scale down to reinforce their regional dominance. One of the largest U.S. banks, for example, announced plans earlier this year to slim down by winding down its brokerage operations and concentrating on its stronger businesses. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it