On the phase angle role in the shear response of ZK60 Mg alloys under multiaxial fatigue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proportional and non-proportional multiaxial fatigue tests are conducted on the closed-die forged ZK60 extrusion. The shear strain amplitude was kept constant at 0.5% for all the tests, while two different axial strain amplitudes of 0.4% and 0.7% were considered. At the higher strain amplitude (0.7%) significant difference was observed between the torque amplitudes of proportional and non-proportional tests, whereas the axial load amplitude responses remained the same regardless of the phase angle shifts. It is likely that as the phase angle changes from 0-90, the twin volume fraction at the peak shear strain decreases resulting in higher torque responses. On the other hand, at the lower strain amplitude, i.e. 0.4%, where twinning is not active, phase angle does not show any effect on the shear response. An energy-based fatigue model is employed that effectively explains the different damage contributions by the axial and torsional loadings at different strain amplitudes, and accurately predicts the proportional and non-proportional multiaxial fatigue lives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".