Can We Deploy Tactile Internet Applications over Wi-Fi, 3G and WiMAX: a Comparative Study based on Riverbed Modeler
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the birth of mobile networks and the Internet of things (IoT), the focus of the new generation of mobile communications is moving towards appending haptic information to traditional audiovisual multimedia. This will extremely demand an ultra-low latency with high availability, reliability and secure networks, which is referred to as the Tactile Internet. In the frame of preparing the adequate infrastructure for haptic communications, that play a major role in Tactile Internet, this article estimates several key performance indicators (KPIs) such as jitter, end-2-end delay, throughput and packet loss through simulations of different networks backbones (Wi-Fi, 3G and WiMAX) using Riverbed modeler. These KPIs help us evaluate the network's performance, taking into consideration the distance from users to the access point, the different types of applications as well as their minimum Quality of Service (QoS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it