Throughput-Oriented Non-Orthogonal Random Access Scheme for Massive MTC Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine-type communications (MTC) technology, which enables direct communications among devices, plays an important role in realizing Internet-of-Things. However, a large number of MTC devices can cause severe collisions. As a result, the network throughput is decreased and the access delay is increased. To address this issue, a throughput-oriented non-orthogonal random access (NORA) scheme is proposed for massive machine-type communications (mMTC) networks. Specifically, by employing the technique of tagged preambles (PAs), multiple MTC devices (MTCDs) choosing the same PA can be distinguished and regarded as a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) group, which enables multiple MTCDs to share the same physical uplink shared channel for transmissions by multiplexing in the power domain. The Sukhatme's classic theory and the characteristic function approach are adopted to formulate an optimization problem. The aim is to maximize the throughput subject to the constraints on the power back-off factor, the number of MTCDs included in a NOMA group, and the successful transmission probability. Based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, the formulated optimization problem is efficiently solved. The derived solution can be used to adjust the access class barring factor such that more MTCDs can obtain the access opportunities. Moreover, a low-complexity suboptimal solution is also developed, which can achieve near-PSO performance under high data rate requirement. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can efficiently improve the network performance and comparison is made with the existing schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".