Inteligencia emocional, calidad de vida y alexitimia en personas mayores institucionalizadas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the stage of old age it is important the study of emotions and how these affect to adaptation and quality of life of older people. Some authors show up the importance of emotional intelligence and quality of life. Alexithymia refers to the difficulty to understand and identify feelings and those of others and externally oriented thinking. The aim is study the relationship between emotional intelligence, quality of life and alexithymia in a group of elderly. The participants were 25 elderly in an institutionalized center of Murcia; there were 12 men. The questionnaires were used: The brief inventory of emotional intelligence for major (EQ-I-M20), the questionnaire of qualit evaluation of life in residential context (CECAVIR) and The brief scale of alexitimia of Toronto (TAS-20). It found significant positive correlations between: the difficulty to identify feelings and the social and familiar relations; the difficulty to identify feelings and satisfaction with the life; the difficulty to describe feelings and the social and familiar relations as well as a significant negative correlation between difficulty to describe feelings and adaptability. The results will allow to advance in the implantation of activities that promote the emotional development of the elderly institutionalized persons in favor of his quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.070 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it