MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994289367

The Purpose of Education, Free Voluntary Reading, and Dealing with the Impact of Poverty

2016· article· en· W2994289367 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)SurpriseMeaning (existential)PovertyPublic relationsProcess (computing)SociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceSocial psychologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

meaning of life to find your gift. The purpose of life to give it away. Pablo Picasso.As we mature, we find our unique talents and interests, develop them, and discover how to use them to help others. Among the ways school can help in this process to encourage free voluntary reading, an extremely pleasant activity. This cannot happen, however, without access to books and other reading material. Unfortunately, children of poverty have little access to books: Often, their only source of books the library.We Are All Different, We Are All SpecialEach of us has unique talents, interests and desires. Along with many others, will assume in this column that in our younger years, we are supposed to find out what our talents, interests and desires are, and as we grow up we start to develop our unique talents. And as we mature, we discover how to use our talents to help others. There are thus three steps: 1) Find your talent; 2) Develop your talent; 3) Use your talent.Things ChangeIt's hard to predict, especially about the future. (Yogi Berra)The history of science and technology has taught us that new developments are nearly always a surprise. This is, of course, a problem for education.A popular view that we must prepare today's students for specific 21st Century Skills. Many experts behave as if they know what these skills are. Most of us have no idea. In fact, it impossible for societies to make detailed plans for the future.There a solution. Instead of training students for professions that may be obsolete by the time they graduate, school should help students their strengths:... it is...difficult to predict what new businesses will emerge and what will become obsolete. Thus, what becomes highly valuable are unique talents, knowledge, and skills, the ability to adapt to changes, and creativity, all of which calls for a school culture that respects and cultivates expertise in a diversity of talents and skills and a curriculum that enables individuals to pursue their strengths (Zhao, 2009, p. 156).Thus, the path of discovering your talent, developing it, and using it for the benefit of others the best path for both the individual and society. School should be a place to help young people on this journey:... if you don't discover things you're good at and things you love to do, then you never quite discover what you're capable of or really who you are. think that, increasingly, the mission of schools has to focus on the development of our individual talents and abilities, among all of the other things that we need to learn in common. Schools should also help us discover more about ourselves and the lives that we should be leading (Robinson, 2014, p. 159).An Example: Free Voluntary ReadingThere are many ways to help young people along the path. One powerful way school can help to encourage free voluntary reading.Free voluntary reading means reading because you want to and what you want to, without book reports or any kind of accountability. It a very pleasant means of finding our talents, developing some of the competences that help us get better at our chosen path, and developing ideas on how to use our talents.The Pleasure of ReadingAbundant research showe that self-selected reading pleasant: In fact, it much more than pleasant.Reading for pleasure produces the state we reach when we are deeply but effortlessly involved in an activity (Csikzentmihalyi, 1991). In flow, the concerns of everyday life and even awareness of the self diminish and even temporarily - our sense of time altereded; nothing but the activity seems to matter.Reading is currently perhaps the most often mentioned flow activity in the word (Csikzentmihalyi, 1991, p. 117). Pleasure readers' reports confirm that they are often in a state of flow: A resident of Northern Italy noted that when he reads, I immediately immerse myself in the reading, and the problems usually worry about disappear (Massimini, Csikzentmihalyi, & Della Faye, 1992, p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it