MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994312634

Functional Foods and Intellectual Property Rights: The Importance of an Integrated Approach

2006· article· en· W2994312634 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Karen Lynne Durell

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth law review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Source Software Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual propertyFunctional foodBusinessMarketingPublic economicsEconomicsMedicinePolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Functional foods are a relatively recent technology, but this form of innovation is almost daily increasing in marketplace importance. One author has stated that the growing importance of functional foods is due to the fact that, is estimated that the purchasing decisions of at least eighty percent of primary shoppers in America are influenced by the desire to manage and/or prevent a specific disease or condition, or to follow a doctors' advice. (1) These statistics show that the public is attracted to the promise of significant health benefits that functional foods may offer. These consumers want to optimize their health and may therefore be open to the utilization of therapies that are alternatives to conventional medicines. (2) The market size of functional foods in the US-estimated to be $265 billion--demonstrates the high level of public interest. (3) As with other emerging technologies, the role of intellectual property rights [IPRs] in the functional food sphere is a critical topic. Presently the commercial market all but insists that key technologies seek IPR protection. (4) Functional foods are no exception. It should be noted that there are two forms of functional foods; those which are developed as a result of scientific research, and those which are familiar foods that naturally offer particular health benefits. The IPRs that may be sought to protect each form of functional foods may differ. This is true because new and existing functional foods have different characteristics, as do the various forms of IPRs which may apply to a functional food project--namely patents, copyright, trademark, etc. The relationship between types of functional foods and forms of IPRs are interwoven, as the combination of IPRs which may apply to a functional food will be dictated by the nature of the functional food itself. For example, processed foods, such as breads with added Omega-3, may attract different IPRs than fruit produce that has been crossbred to comprise increased anti-oxidants. (5) Of course, the act of seeking IPRs is only one step towards the goal of achieving adequate intellectual property [IP] protection for a functional food. Another crucial step is IP management. This step involves taking a big-picture view of a functional food innovation and its intended application and uses. Only when looking through a wide-angle lens can the interrelation of forms of IPRs and the implication of IPR applications be seen and analysed. This paper will therefore be divided into two sections. First, we will address the different IPRs that may be granted to aspects of a functional food innovation. Second, we will identify how IP property management may be applied to a research project and the benefits of doing so. The culmination of this discussion will be a better understanding of how IPRs granted in a functional food research project are interrelated and how this relationship should shape the application of the IPRs generally. 1. IPRs for Functional Foods The form of IPR that is most commonly associated with research projects is patent rights. In fact, in some situations the discussion of IPRs begins and ends with patent rights--if a project is not patentable it is considered not to be eligible for IPR protection. (6) This is a narrow view of IPRs and a misperception of the breadth of rights that may attach to aspects of a research project. The truth is that there are several forms of IPRs in existence and depending upon the nature of a research project, a variety of rights may be utilized to provide protection to elements of a functional foods project. Functional foods come in many different forms--yogurts with pro-biotics; fruits with enhanced nutritional value; or eggs, breads and fruit juices with Omega-3 added--just to name a few examples. For the purpose of this paper we will focus on a recent functional food project, the Authentique d'Orleans strawberry. Through crossbreeding, researchers at Agriculture and Agri-foods Canada and the Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods Institute of Laval University have developed a strawberry that has double the antioxidants of traditional strawberries. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.058
Scholarly communication0.0250.041
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0190.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth law reviewSame topicOpen Source Software InnovationsFrench-language works237,207