MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2994541255

Ethnic Differences in Self-Employment among Southeast Asian Refugees in Canada [*]

2000· article· en· W2994541255 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Small Business Management · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnameseRefugeeImmigrationDisadvantageEthnic groupSelf-employmentEntrepreneurshipPolitical scienceDemographic economicsIndigenousEconomic growthGender studiesSociologyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With limited or non-transferable skills, lack of fluency in English, and the need to become self-supporting, refugees and immigrants historically have turned to ethnic entrepreneurship, resulting in successful immigrant businesses (Bonacich 1987, Gold 1992). When the Boat People from Vietnam and Laos arrived in North America during 1979-81, there was speculation about how they would fare in an employment market for which their skills and training might be lacking or inappropriate. For this large group of refugees, self-employment might be the effective strategy it had been for earlier immigrants in North America. This article assesses differences in self-employment among three distinct groups of Southeast Asian refugees who settled in British Columbia, Canada. The three groups are Chinese Vietnamese, ethnic Vietnamese, and Laotian. Identifying the types of businesses established, the characteristics of those involved, and the markets served provides information about the contribution of Southeast Asian refugees to their new country. This is particularly important at a time when controversies over the contribution of immigrants and refugees to the Canadian and U.S. economies are prevalent. Ethnic comparisons identify common as well as unique characteristics of each group's approach to self-employment and broaden the research on the role of self-employment in the economic adaptation of refugees. Reasons for Self Employment Both culture and disadvantage theory help explain why immigrants become self-employed (Light 1980). According to culture theory, individuals from a culture that is predisposed to business are likely to engage in business enterprises when they settle in another country. Disadvantage theory suggests that immigrants whose education and professional training are not marketable, whose language skills are limited, and who experience discrimination in the non-ethnic labor force may start a business to support themselves. Establishing and Maintaining Ethnic Businesses Because the Boat People arrived with limited or no financial resources, those who started a business had to postpone doing so until they could obtain a loan and/or save enough money. Personal savings is the most common initial financing for minority businesses (Feldman, Koberg, and Dean 1991). Additional sources have included rotating credit and saving associations organized by a group of refugees to provide financing for small businesses (Chotigeat, Balsmeier, and Stanley 1991), personal savings from extended family and friends, and loans from Chinese investors in North America or off-shore. Because of their flexibility, these sources seem to have been preferred over the more formal options available from banks (Gold 1992). Geographic concentration of an ethnic group is advantageous to its ethnic businesses, as proximity gives them easy access to consumers and workers from the group (Gold 1992). For this reason, this study focused on the Southeast Asian communities in Vancouver, British Columbia. When the Boat People arrived in this area, there was already a large Chinatown. Since the mid-1980s, there has been increased immigration from Hong Kong. Between 1981 and 1991, Hong Kong immigrants made up 7.8 percent of the 1.2 million immigrants to Canada; Vietnamese immigrants constituted 5.6 percent of this cohort. In 1991, 70 percent of recent immigrants in Vancouver were from Asia and the Middle East (Badets 1993). Thus, there appear to be enough co-ethnics in the area to provide Asian businesses with funds, markets, suppliers, employees, and customers. Although this geographic concentration might have favored Cantonese-speaking refugees, who could find employment with Chinese businesses (Buchignani 1988), the Chinese Vietnamese were not any more likely than the Vietnamese or Laotians to find employment in Asian businesses (Johnson 1988). Furthermore, Chinese Vietnamese who worked in Chinese restaurants did so out of necessity, not preference (Indra 1988). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it