MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Witnessing Indigenous Dispossession and Academic Arboricide: Visual Auto-Ethnography as Anti-Colonial Didactic

2019· article· en· W2994977660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVisual Arts Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEthnographyColonialismWitnessLiminalityNarrativeSociologyFraming (construction)AnthropologyHistoryArchaeologyPolitical scienceEcologyLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Indigenous and non-Indigenous academics are witnesses to the “more than human” ecological impacts of the academic condition, such as the deforestation that occurs in relation to infrastructure expansion of campus sites. In this essay, I use auto-ethnographic photography to evoke the necessity of academic answerability by framing the act of deforestation within the academic boundary as that of land theft and ecological conquest, with political, cultural, and epistemic implications. My visual narrative about my employing university begins with an archival image from the time of the clearing of the campus site, and is sustained by a visual inquiry process that examines the liminal zones of the campus as it expands into the surrounding forest. My intention in this photography-led research practice is to “witness” campus deforestation, seeing it as part and parcel of the colonial academic enterprise in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.459 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it