MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Specifics of Ethnocultural Relations between the Ukrainian Diaspora and Ukraine in the Period from the Mid-1980s to the Mid-1990s

2019· article· en· W2995065455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsECW Press (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianDiasporaPolitical scienceElitePeriod (music)PoliticsIndependence (probability theory)HomelandGeographyHistoryLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the peculiarities of ethnocultural relations between Ukraine and its diaspora in the period from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. It is theoretically substantiated that relations between Ukraine and the diaspora were altering from sporadic contacts, subordinate to the totalitarian administrative-command system, to the systematic and comprehensive, mutually beneficial cooperation on a democratic basis. It is revealed that, as a result of these relations, a common ethnocultural space was formed, contributing to the preservation and development of the Ukrainian identity and the complex of ethnocultural relations. Ethnocultural changes that occurred during the critical period of the USSR’s collapse and the new problems which Ukraine faced at that turning point of its development are traced. It is proved that during that period the Ukrainian diaspora contributed to solving both internal and external problems of Ukraine. Ukraine’s relations with the diaspora in all key areas of ethnocultural relations are considered. Two main stages of ethnocultural and political development of the state are distinguished: 1985–1991 and 1991–1995. It is found that after Ukraine had gained independence, its relations with the diaspora radically changed. Those shifts took place in all areas of the Ukrainian ethnocultural space. It is shown that during the first stage, Ukraine’s contacts with representatives of the diaspora were sporadic and took place only under the direct supervision and tight control of the Soviet special services. In the time of political repressions, linguistic and cultural Russification of Ukraine, its national elite was forced to follow the instructions of the Communist Party of the USSR. Ukrainians outside Ukraine were also threatened by ethnocultural assimilation, thus uniting in spiritual, cultural, and religious senses worldwide. During the second stage, i.e. after the declaration of independence, the above mentioned relations underwent significant transformations. This was testified by the emergence of a common ethnocultural space, in which the efforts of the representatives of Ukraine and the diaspora in combating the consequences of the forced assimilation and serving the emergence of a strong and free country were combined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it