Utilizing plane group symmetry to favor noncentrosymmetry in three-dimensional crystals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Materials that lack inversion symmetry (noncentrosymmetric) demonstrate a diversity of desirable optical and electronic properties in bulk such as second harmonic generation, chiral emission, and piezo-, pyro-, and ferro-electricity. Unfortunately, it is challenging to reliably access noncentrosymmetric packing motifs because the closest packing of molecules is often achieved through inversion symmetry operators, leading to the relatively low occurrence of noncentrosymmetry in organic crystals. In this study, the occurrence of noncentrosymmetry in materials that adopt planar packing motifs is investigated because molecular species achieve closest packing in two dimensions through rotations and (or) glides, symmetry operators that do not individually lead to centrosymmetry. It is found that of the 18 crystal structures investigated here adopting planar packing motifs, 13 structures (72%) are noncentrosymmetric showing in-plane polarization. The 13 noncentrosymmetric crystal structures differ from the centrosymmetric structures by directional halogen bonding interactions or steric collisions that align the polarization directions of neighboring layers, leading to bulk structural polarity. The results from this investigation will be of use for designing noncentrosymmetric materials for application in optical and electronic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it