MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995572343 · doi:10.1145/3377006.3377014

Bit complexity for critical point computation in smooth and compact real hypersurfaces

2019· article· en· W2995572343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypersurfaceJacobian matrix and determinantMathematicsExtension (predicate logic)PolynomialProjection (relational algebra)Rank (graph theory)Algebraic numberDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the polynomial mapping defined by the projection to the first coordinate on a real, smooth and compact hypersurface. The critical points of this mapping in generic coordinates have several applications in real algebraic geometry. We provide bit complexity estimates for computing them. Generic coordinates are obtained by applying a randomly chosen linear change of variables to the polynomial defining the hypersurface. The coordinates are sufficiently generic when the Jacobian matrix of the system under study has full rank at the critical points and when the number of critical points is finite. We have proven a new quantitative extension of Thom's weak transversality theorem [1]. By applying this extension, we are able to choose sufficiently generic changes of variables with arbitrarily high probability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it