MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995825383 · doi:10.1115/1.4045481

Multiscale Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Toward Resolving Manufacturable Roughness

2019· article· en· W2995825383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsSiemens (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface roughnessSurface finishComputational fluid dynamicsFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceMechanical engineeringBlock (permutation group theory)Materials scienceComputational scienceSimulationMechanicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Typical turbomachinery aerothermal problems of practical interest are characterized by flow structures of wide-ranging scales, which interact with each other. Such multiscale interactions can be observed between the flow structures produced by surface roughness and by the bulk flow patterns. Moreover, additive manufacturing (AM) may sooner or later open a new chapter in the way components are designed by granting designers the ability to control the shape and patterns of surface roughness. As a result, surface finish, which so far has been treated largely as a stochastic trait, can be shifted to a set of design parameters that consist of repetitive, discrete micro-elements on a wall surface (“manufacturable roughness”). Considering this prospective capability, the question would arise regarding how surface microstructures can be incorporated in computational analyses during designing in the future. Semi-empirical methods for predicting aerothermal characteristics and the impact of manufacturable roughness could be used to minimize computational cost. However, the lack of element-to-element resolution may lead to erroneous predictions, as the interactions among the roughness micro-elements have been shown to be significant for adequate performance predictions (Kapsis and He, 2018, “Analysis of Aerothermal Characteristics of Surface Micro-Structures,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 140(5), p. 051104). In this paper, a new multiscale approach based on the novel block spectral method (BSM) is adopted. This method aims to provide efficient resolution of the detailed local flow variation in space and time of the large-scale microstructures. This resolution is provided without resorting to modeling every single ones in detail, as a conventional large-scale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation would demand, but still demonstrating similar time-accurate and time-averaged flow properties. The main emphasis of this work is to develop a parallelized solver of the method to enable tackling large problems. The work also includes a first of the kind verification and demonstration of the method for wall surfaces with a large number of microstructured elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it