MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A methane sink in the Central American high elevation páramo: Topographic, soil moisture and vegetation effects

2019· article· en· W2995991301 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversidad Nacional de Costa Rica
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSink (geography)Plateau (mathematics)MethaneHydrology (agriculture)Soil horizonVegetation (pathology)MoistureSoil waterAtmospheric sciencesGeologySoil scienceEcologyChemistryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methane (CH4) is a strong greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 23 times larger than that of carbon dioxide. Characterizing ecosystems as either sources or sinks for methane and their magnitudes informs on biosphere contributions to the global CH4 budget and to warming of the atmosphere. We quantified methane fluxes for the first time in a neotropical alpine páramo (Valle de Los Conejos, Chirripó Massif, Costa Rica) and examined the relationships of these fluxes with topography, soil moisture and vegetation, during the transition from dry to rainy season. Using closed chambers and laser spectroscopy, we measured soil CH4 and CO2 fluxes across a field site encompassing: a grassy plain as well as a plain, a gentle slope and a plateau dominated by a dwarf bamboo (Chusquea subtessellata Hitchcock). We found that the páramo landscape acts as a sink for CH4 [−53.1 ± 29.6 (mean ± SE) µg C m−2 hr−1]. Of the four field areas, the grassy plain was on average the strongest CH4 sink, likely because this soil profile had no drainage restrictions and was well aerated. By contrast, in the slope and plateau, a heavily-consolidated subsurface layer was shown to perch water, increasing surface soil moisture and limiting CH4 uptake. Conversely, in certain parts of the plain, where Chusquea grew vigorously in discrete, tall patches, we found intense CH4 uptake beneath these patches. Within the Chusquea plain, these hot spots of CH4 uptake localized under the tall Chusquea had double the uptake rates than outside these patches, with even greater uptake than the average in the grassy plain. Our results show that CH4 uptake in the páramo is driven by moisture interacting with impeding soil layers, vegetation and topography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it