A Survey on Deep Learning Empowered IoT Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely regarded as a key component of the Internet of the future and thereby has drawn significant interests in recent years. IoT consists of billions of intelligent and communicating “things”, which further extend borders of the world with physical and virtual entities. Such ubiquitous smart things produce massive data every day, posing urgent demands on quick data analysis on various smart mobile devices. Fortunately, the recent breakthroughs in deep learning have enabled us to address the problem in an elegant way. Deep models can be exported to process massive sensor data and learn underlying features quickly and efficiently for various IoT applications on smart devices. In this article, we survey the literature on leveraging deep learning to various IoT applications. We aim to give insights on how deep learning tools can be applied from diverse perspectives to empower IoT applications in four representative domains, including smart healthcare, smart home, smart transportation, and smart industry. A main thrust is to seamlessly merge the two disciplines of deep learning and IoT, resulting in a wide-range of new designs in IoT applications, such as health monitoring, disease analysis, indoor localization, intelligent control, home robotics, traffic prediction, traffic monitoring, autonomous driving, and manufacture inspection. We also discuss a set of issues, challenges, and future research directions that leverage deep learning to empower IoT applications, which may motivate and inspire further developments in this promising field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it