MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996461817 · doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1705974

Ridge estimation in linear mixed measurement error models with stochastic linear mixed restrictions

2019· article· en· W2996461817 on OpenAlexaff
Bahareh Yavarizadeh, Abdolrahman Rasekh, S. Ejaz Ahmed, Babak Babadi

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersIran National Science Foundation
KeywordsMulticollinearityEstimatorMathematicsMean squared errorRidgeApplied mathematicsMonte Carlo methodMinimum mean square errorStatisticsMathematical optimizationLinear regressionGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is concentrated on the problem of multicollinearity in linear mixed models (LMMs) with measurement error in the fixed effects variables. After introducing a ridge estimator (RE) in these models, we propose a new estimator called the stochastic restricted ridge estimator (SRRE) by combining the ridge estimator (RE) and the stochastic restricted estimator (SRE). Moreover, asymptotic properties of these estimators will be derived and the necessary and sufficient conditions for the superiority of the SRRE over the RE and SRE are obtained using the mean squared error matrix (MSEM). Finally, the theoretical findings of the proposed estimators are also evaluated with a Monte Carlo simulation study and a numerical example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.364
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and ComputationSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207