MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996490494 · doi:10.7202/1065074ar

GESTURING TOWARD THE VISUAL: VIRTUAL REALITY, HYPERTEXT AND EMBODIED FEMINIST CRITICISM

2019· article· en· W2996490494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurfaces · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Technology, and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipCriticismHypertextEmbodied cognitionBaroqueAestheticsFeminismSociologyArtVisual artsLiteratureComputer sciencePhilosophyEpistemologyGender studiesLawWorld Wide WebPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feminist critics have been as slow to take up the tools of electronic scholarship as the academy has been at recognizing on-line criticism as a legitimate mode of investigation. Canadian experimental feminist authors and artists, however, are proving more likely to embrace the philosophy, if not necessarily the medium, of electronic possibilities. The potential for cutting edge hypertext feminist scholarship is examined through an examination of Nicole Brossard's use of Virtual Reality as a feminist discourse in her novel Baroque at Dawn (Baroque d'aube) and Catherine Richards' body-based, real time art explorations in her Virtual Reality installation pieces entitled The Virtual Body and Curiosity Cabinet, at the End of the Millennium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it