Experiences of First Insulin-Treated Patients (1922–1923)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historical description of first insulin trials just after its discovery. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The review includes first initiatives of insulin treatment. The probability of other trials, not reported to the Insulin Committee of the University of Toronto and conducted in the years 1922 and 1923, is quite low. DATA SOURCES: (1) Archival Collections, University of Toronto: Insulin Discovery and Early Developments of Insulin (University of Toronto Libraries digital special collection, with a particular section entitled "From a Patient's Point of View" containing letters, patient charts, newspaper clippings, and photographs). (2) Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library: Academy of Medicine Collection, F. G. Banting Papers, C. H. Best Papers, J. B.Collip Papers, W. R. Feasby Papers, E. Hugues Papers, J. J. R. Macleod Papers. (3) National Library of Medicine: PubMed search for the topic of history of insulin, History of Medicine-on syllabus archive. (4) Selected Journals for History of Medicine: Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Medical History. (5) Selected books: The Discovery of Insulin (M. Bliss); Diabetes, Its Medical and Cultural History (D. von Engelhardt); H. C. Hagedorn and Danish Insulin (T.Deckert), Continuing Quest (W. A. Tomkins). THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: This historical review shows the quick progress from impure pancreatic extract to the selective isoelectric precipitation of the hormone, which made possible the introduction of insulin in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The coordination between the Departments of Physiology (Connaught Laboratories) and Medicine (Toronto General Hospital) was essential for the discovery and implementation of insulin therapy. The Insulin Committee was decisive for the negotiation with the pharmaceutical industry, the purification, grand-scale production, patents' achievement, and provision of licenses to expert clinicians and prestigious health centers. At the end of the year 1923, insulin treatment was already extended to Europe (mainly Scandinavia, Great Britain, and Spain). Insulin discovery and treatment changed the clinical spectrum of diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".