MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997610263 · doi:10.1109/mias.2019.2943630

A Guide to Securing Industrial Control Networks: Integrating IT and OT Systems

2019· article· en· W2997610263 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Industry Applications Magazine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Industrial control systemHackerComputer securityIndustrial InternetProductivityThe InternetControl (management)Computer scienceEngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Internet of ThingsBusinessWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the introduction of the computer and increasingly more so with the addition of the Internet, the threat of hackers and viruses attacking these systems has existed. This assault has been focused on the front-facing IT systems. However, with connectivity advancements related to plant floor networks, and as we become a globally connected enterprise, the security of the industrial control network must consider all levels of the system, including operational technology (OT). This article discusses the current industrial situation as well as the practices that should be adopted to provide the necessary security, policies that provide flexibility to the users so to ensure productivity, and further insight to developers who are building new security solutions and products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it