MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997667424 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2963388

Highly Accurate Bathroom Activity Recognition Using Infrared Proximity Sensors

2019· article· en· W2997667424 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToiletComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)LimitingActivity recognitionAssisted livingArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionComputer visionMedicineEngineeringGerontologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among elderly populations over the world, a high percentage of individuals are affected by physical or mental diseases, greatly influencing their quality of life. As it is a known fact that they wish to remain in their own home for as long as possible, solutions must be designed to detect these diseases automatically, limiting the reliance on human resources. To this end, our team developed a sensors platform based on infrared proximity sensors to accurately recognize basic bathroom activities such as going to the toilet and showering. This article is based on the body of scientific literature which establish evidences that activities relative to corporal hygiene are strongly correlated to health status and can be important signs of the development of eventual disorders. The system is built to be simple, affordable and highly reliable. Our experiments have shown that it can yield an F-Score of 96.94%. Also, the durations collected by our kit are approximately 6 seconds apart from the real ones; those results confirm the reliability of our kit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it