MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997862816 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2962608

S<sup>3</sup>egANet: 3D Spinal Structures Segmentation via Adversarial Nets

2019· article· en· W2997862816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersProject of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology ProgramNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceVoxelModality (human–computer interaction)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D spinal structures segmentation is crucial to reduce the time-consumption issue and provide quantitative parameters for disease treatment and surgical operation. However, the most related studies of spinal structures segmentation are based on 2D or 3D single structure segmentation. Due to the high complexity of spinal structures, the segmentation of 3D multiple spinal structures with consistently reliable and high accuracy is still a significant challenge. We developed and validated a relatively complete solution for the simultaneous 3D semantic segmentation of multiple spinal structures at the voxel level named as the S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> egANet. Firstly, S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> egANet explicitly solved the high variety and variability of complex 3D spinal structures through a multi-modality autoencoder module that was capable of extracting fine-grained structural information. Secondly, S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> egANet adopted a cross-modality voxel fusion module to incorporate comprehensive spatial information from multi-modality MRI images. Thirdly, we presented a multi-stage adversarial learning strategy to achieve high accuracy and reliability segmentation of multiple spinal structures simultaneously. Extensive experiments on MRI images of 90 patients demonstrated that S <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> egANet achieved mean Dice coefficient of 88.3% and mean Sensitivity of 91.45%, which revealed its effectiveness and potential as a clinical tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it