Flow-Path Tracking Strategy in a Data-Driven Interwell Numerical Simulation Model for Waterflooding History Matching and Performance Prediction with Infill Wells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Recently, we have developed two computationally efficient data-driven models—interwell numerical simulation model (INSIM) and INSIM with front tracking (INSIM-FT)—for history matching, prediction, characterization, and optimization of waterflooding reservoirs. Then, stemming from the INSIM family, we derived a new data-driven model referred to as INSIM with flow-path tracking (FPT), for more-accurate interwell connectivity calculations, dynamic flow-path tracking, and waterflooding predictions. The model is a connection-based simulation model that is developed on the basis of a two-phase-flow material-balance equation. With the new model, we can characterize a reservoir by history matching the historical well flow-rate data without the detailed petrophysical properties of the reservoir. In INSIM-FPT, we provide an automatic and systematic workflow that incorporates Delaunay triangulation and imaginary wells to construct the model connection map. We apply a modified depth-first searching method to track all influential flow paths between an injector/producer pair for more-accurate calculations of dynamic allocation factors and control pore volumes (PVs). In addition, we provide a method to visualize a saturation field for a history-matched INSIM-FPT model. On the basis of the saturation map, we design a workflow to evaluate possible drilling locations and future performance of infill wells. For application, we create a synthetic reservoir with two different scenarios to demonstrate the reliability of INSIM-FPT. The results show that the dynamic allocation factors and control PVs between injector/producer pairs in the history-matched INSIM-FPT models are consistent with those obtained from the true streamline simulation model. Furthermore, the oil-saturation field generated with INSIM-FPT reasonably matches that obtained with the true model. It shows that the future predictions of infill wells on the basis of history-matched INSIM-FPT models are reasonably accurate but can be improved if more observed data are collected from near the planned infill wells. We also test a large-scale field problem with 65 wells, which shows INSIM-FPT can reasonably match and predict the field data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".