"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Vibrio parahaemolyticus RhsP represents a widespread group of pro-effectors for type VI secretion systems
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) translocate effector proteins, such as Rhs toxins, to eukaryotic cells or prokaryotic competitors. All T6SS Rhs-type effectors characterized thus far contain a PAAR motif or a similar structure. Here, we describe a T6SS-dependent delivery mechanism for a subset of Rhs proteins that lack a PAAR motif. We show that the N-terminal Rhs domain of protein RhsP (or VP1517) from Vibrio parahaemolyticus inhibits the activity of the C-terminal DNase domain. Upon auto-proteolysis, the Rhs fragment remains inside the cells, and the C-terminal region interacts with PAAR2 and is secreted by T6SS2; therefore, RhsP acts as a pro-effector. Furthermore, we show that RhsP contributes to the control of certain "social cheaters" (opaR mutants). Genes encoding proteins with similar Rhs and PAAR-interacting domains, but diverse C-terminal regions, are widely distributed among Vibrio species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".