MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998481686 · doi:10.1299/jsmermd.2019.2a1-g03

Anomaly Detection Based on Deep Learning Using Skeleton Information for Prevention of Industrial Accident

2019· article· en· W2998481686 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of JSME annual Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (Robomec) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsConestoga Meat Packers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderAnomaly detectionComputer scienceAccident (philosophy)Skeleton (computer programming)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningAnomaly (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Japan, the number of casualties due to an industrial accident in 2009 was 114,154 people. Currently, a comprehensive system to prevent such an accident is basically done manually. Furthermore, it has not been automated. Therefore, in this study, we develop an anomaly detection method for the prevention of industrial accident using machine learning technology. In order to carry out anomaly detection reliably, we use a skeleton map of a person as training data from skeleton information extracted by OpenPose. Here, Variation Autoencoder (VAE) is applied as a deep learning model. We confirm that detection results with high accuracy are produced compared with the conventional method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it