Machine Learning-Based Self-Compensating Approximate Computing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dedicated hardware accelerators are suitable for parallel computational tasks. Moreover, they have the tendency to accept inexact results. These hardware accelerators are extensively used in image processing and computer vision applications, e.g., to process the dense 3-D maps required for self-driving cars. Such error-tolerant hardware accelerators can be designed approximately for reduced power consumption and/or processing time. However, since for some inputs the output errors may reach unacceptable levels, the main challenge is to enhance the accuracy of the results of approximate accelerators and keep the error magnitude within an allowed range. Towards this goal, in this paper, we propose a novel machine learning-based self-compensating approximate accelerators for energy efficient systems. The proposed error compensation module, which is integrated within the architecture of approximate hardware accelerators, efficiently reduces the accumulated error at its output. It utilizes lightweight supervised machine learning techniques, i.e., decision tree, to capture input dependency of the error. We consider image blending application in multiplication mode to demonstrate a practical application of self-compensating approximate computing. Simulation results show that the proposed design of self-compensating approximate accelerator can achieve about 9% accuracy enhancement, with negligible overhead in other performance measures, i.e., power, area, delay and energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it