Prevalence of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction among psychiatric outpatients attending a tertiary care hospital
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in psychiatric outpatients treated with fluoxetine, paroxetine, venlafaxine or mirtazapine. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. All patients above 18 years of age, attending psychiatric clinic and taking fluoxetine, paroxetiene, venlafaxine or mirtazapine for various indications were invited to participate in the study. A data collection sheet was designed to document the patients` demographic features, psychiatric diagnosis, type, dose and duration of antidepressant treatment. Sexual side effects` part of Toronto Side Effect Scale (TSES) was used to assess the presence of sexual dysfunction RESULTS: A total of 137 patients (Male: 51%, Female: 49%) were included in the study. The mean age for the participants was 38 years (range: 19-72 years).The number of patients for each antidepressant was as follows: paroxetine (52 patients), fluoxetine (36), mirtazapine (36 patients) and venlafaxine (17 patients). The average duration of the antidepressant use was 3.9 years. The overall prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 39%. Paroxetine was the most common antidepressant associated with sexual dysfunction especially for decreased libido (59.6%) and delayed ejaculation (34.4%). In contrary, mirtazapine was the lowest among antidepressants to cause sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction is common among patients treated with antidepressants particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Addressing this side effects early in treatment can improve compliance to treatment and prevent relapse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it