MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999607364 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2019.2962359

On the Design of Low-Power Hybrids for Full Duplex Simultaneous Bidirectional Signaling Links

2020· article· en· W2999607364 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Yuan, Ahmed Naguib, Sudip Shekhar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute of Public Health InspectorsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIntel Corporation
KeywordsResistorTransceiverTransimpedance amplifierElectrical engineeringAmplifierElectronic engineeringWheatstone bridgeCMOSTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceEngineeringVoltageDifferential amplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the suitability of full duplex simultaneous bidirectional (FD-SBD) signaling as a method to theoretically double the aggregate data transfer per pin for ultra-short-reach links. Advantages as well as challenges associated with differential FD-SBD links are described, and comparisons are made with single-ended and multilevel signaling schemes. FD-SBD links require a hybrid to recover the weak received signal from the large self-interfering transmitted signal. After providing a summary of prior-art high-speed hybrids, which often utilize replica drivers and current-mode signaling, two voltage-mode hybrids are presented and compared to enable low-power FD-SBD links at high data rates without using any replica drivers. This includes an R-Gmdriver, as well as a resistor-bridge driver derived from a Wheatstone-bridge. It is shown that maintaining a uniform termination impedance is important to support FD-SBD signaling on low insertion-loss links. Accordingly, a resistor-bridge hybrid utilizing an averaging resistor embedded in the output transimpedance amplifier based voltage-mode driver is implemented. A prototype implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process is measured within a transceiver front-end at an aggregate data rate of 15 Gb/s over a short differential channel with 2.5 dB insertion loss at 3.75 GHz on a 4-layer FR4 PCB. The energy/bit for the transceiver front-end is 1.35 pJ/b at an aggregate data rate of 15 Gb/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207