MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000469557 · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900260

Salient Object Detection in the Distributed Cloud-Edge Intelligent Network

2020· article· en· W3000469557 on OpenAlexaff
Zhifan Gao, Heye Zhang, Shizhou Dong, Shanhui Sun, Xin Wang, Guang Yang, Wanqing Wu, Shuo Li, Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Network · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingDistributed computingEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionSalientEdge computingArtificial intelligenceServerObject (grammar)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent network is crucial in the building of telecom networks because it utilizes artificial intelligent technologies to improve the performance. Salient object detection has increasingly attracted interest from intelligent network research since estimating human attention to objects is a crucial step in various surveillance applications. However, the computational-consuming and memory-consuming detection model is still less effective when it is deployed only either on the cloud or on the edge. In this article, we propose a specially-designed cloud-edge distributed framework for salient object detection based on the intelligent network. This framework can overcome the difficulty to transmit massive data in the cloud-only deployment scheme, as well as the difficulty to analyze massive data in the edge-only deployment scheme. However, the traditional cloud-edge distributed schemes are unsuitable to salient object detection task because of two challenges: 1) balance between the within-semantic knowledge and cross-semantic knowledge for the model training in different servers; 2) contradiction between extracting the semantic knowledge with global contextual information and local detailed information. To tackle the first challenge, our framework enables a hierarchical information allocation strategy in the cloud. It can prompt the salient object detection model in the edge to learn more from the similar scenes or semantics with where the edge server is located, while preserving the generalization ability of the model in the different scenes. To address the second challenge, our framework proposes a novel pyramidal deep learning model. It can effectively capture the global contextual features of the salient object, while preserving its local detailed features. The extensive experiments performed on six commonly- used public datasets can demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework and its superiority to 11 state-of-the-art approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE NetworkSame topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207