MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000586094 · doi:10.1109/jphotov.2019.2959934

Material Quality Requirements for Intermediate Band Solar Cells

2020· article· en· W3000586094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersArmy Research Laboratory
KeywordsFigure of meritSolar cellOptoelectronicsSemiconductorAbsorption (acoustics)Materials scienceDiffusionCarrier lifetimeComputer sciencePhysicsSiliconQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intermediate band (IB) solar cells hold the promise of efficiency as high as triple-junction solar cells with much simpler cell design, containing only two semiconductor material interfaces. Although several IB materials have been demonstrated, no cells have shown promising efficiencies. Many of the fundamental required properties of IB materials are well known; they need strong subgap absorption, long carrier lifetimes, and good carrier mobilities. The tradeoffs between these properties, however, are not well understood. We present the first results using a new coupled Poisson/drift-diffusion model designed for IB materials, called Simudo. We compare the results from Simudo to a simpler semianalytic model for IB device performance, highlighting where they agree well. Using both of these models, we perform a systematic study of a figure of merit for IB materials ν. We consider the standard p-IB-n architecture with a high-density IB, in which two depletion junctions are formed. Considering materials with identical electron and hole properties, we show that ν is well correlated with device efficiency. We show for the first time a threshold behavior, where the efficiency of the IB device exceeds that of the standard p-n-junction only for sufficiently high-quality material. We show that ν is similarly predictive of device performance as an equivalent figure of merit is for standard solar cells. These results both give guidance for experiments regarding required IB material properties and demonstrate how detailed device modeling can aid in the design of IB devices, for example, by choosing layer thicknesses optimally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it