The Lord and the Lawyer: Lord Durham, Edward Livingston, and Legal Accommodation in Louisiana
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Le Rapport de Lord Durham (1839) est un document écrit pour guider la gouvernance britannique des colonies canadiennes, dont l’auteur recommande l’assimilation de la population française. Pour Durham, l’État de Louisiane peut servir de modèle parfait d’assimilation d’une population d’origine française en Amérique du Nord anglophone. Durham pensait que les Louisianais d’origine française avaient adopté une identité américaine quand la Louisiane fut incorporée dans l’Union des États en 1812. En réalité, les Louisianais, qui sont sous administration territoriale des États-Unis depuis 1803, ont pris des mesures pour protéger leur identité franco-louisianaise avant 1812, notamment en gagnant de l’influence dans un gouvernement territorial, et en passant des lois pour garder en vigueur la législation en place en Louisiane avant que Napoléon vende la Louisiane aux États-Unis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it