Secure UAV-Enabled Communication Using Han–Kobayashi Signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes Han-Kobayashi signaling (HKS), under which each pair of users decodes a common message to improve their throughput, for UAV-enabled multi-user communication. Given that only a single transmit antenna is used and thus there is no null space of users' channels for inserting an artificial noise that would effectively help to jam an eavesdropper without interfering the users' desired signals, a new information and artificial noise transfer scheme to address physical layer security (PLS) for the considered networks is investigated. Under this scheme, the UAV sends the confidential information to its users within a fraction of the time slot and sends the artificial noise within the remaining fraction. Accordingly, the problem of jointly optimizing the time-fraction, bandwidth and power allocation to maximize the users' worst secrecy throughput is formulated. New inner approximations are proposed for developing path-following algorithms for its computation. Simulation shows that the proposed information and artificial noise transfer enables not only HKS but also orthogonal multi-access and nonorthogonal multi-access to provide PLS for UAV-enabled communication even when the eavesdropper is in the best channel condition. HKS outperforms the other two schemes in terms of users' worst secrecy throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".