MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Weathering Carbonation Behavior of Concrete Subject to Early-Age Carbonation Curing

2020· article· en· W3001325641 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonationCuring (chemistry)Materials scienceWeatheringComposite materialPortland cementCompressive strengthCarbonatationCementGeotechnical engineeringGeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early-age carbonation for concrete curing has gained increasing attention due to the remarkably enhanced material performance and substantial CO2 storage capability. However, carbonation curing leads to reductions in concrete pH and may weaken concrete’s ability to resist weathering carbonation–induced corrosion during service. This study examines the atmospheric weathering carbonation behavior of portland cement–based concretes after carbonation curing. Two types of concrete mixtures representing normal and high-strength concretes were cured with carbonation at two different durations of high-pressure CO2 exposure. Compressive strength and water absorption of concrete were measured upon the completion of carbonation curing and the 28-day subsequent moisture curing. An accelerated weathering carbonation test (AWCT) was consecutively performed for 12 weeks, and concrete carbonation depth, pH distribution, and compressive strength were measured. It was found that the coefficients of CO2 diffusion due to weathering carbonation were significantly reduced in concrete subject to carbonation curing. The ultimate carbonation depth was attributed to both carbonation curing and weathering carbonation. The normal strength concrete with a higher water-to-cement (w/c) ratio showed a larger ultimate carbonation depth because of the more intensive carbonation curing but was found to substantially slow down the rate of weathering carbonation. With sufficient rebar depth, reinforced concretes made with this mix design could potentially develop a more robust resistance to weathering carbonation–induced corrosion through carbonation curing. With a lower w/c ratio, high-strength concrete cured by carbonation appeared less vulnerable to weathering carbonation due to the lower intensity of carbonation curing and hence proved to be viable for this curing approach. On exposure to 12-week AWCT, concrete made with 0.4 w/c ratio exhibited comparable carbonation depths and pH profiles regardless of curing methods. It is inferred that carbonation curing could potentially be applied to normal-strength reinforced concretes with large rebar depths or general high-strength concrete formulations without accentuating the risk of carbonation-induced corrosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it