MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sistema de inteligencia de negocio para la caracterización del turista de naturaleza

2020· article· es· W3006175002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Efraín Velasteguí López, Sayda Cecilia Chamba Melo, Wilson Wilfrido Quille Chimborazo, Yasser Vázquez Alfonso

Bibliographic record

VenueConcienciaDigital · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyCartographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los sistemas de inteligencia de negocio es una de las manifestaciones de la revolución científico técnica contemporánea ampliamente generalizada en países desarrollados. Actualmente los sistemas informáticos aplicados al turismo son muy usados en la práctica internacional ya que han evolucionado las metodologías de investigación turística, posibilitando solucionar los problemas de almacenamiento de datos cada vez más relacionado con el proceso de toma decisiones. En la investigación se realiza un análisis de los conceptos, herramientas y metodologías que se consideran importantes en el problema, reflejando el estado actual en la solución del mismo. El Ministerio de Turismo de Cotopaxi, al tener entre sus misiones y tareas el estricto control del turista que visita sus atractivos turísticos, posee un gran volumen de información que es generada diariamente. Como una respuesta a esa necesidad se decidió implementar un sistema de inteligencia de negocio, para el estudio del perfil de turista que visita los atractivos turísticos de Cotopaxi. La construcción e implementación de este sistema, utilizando el gestor de base datos Postgree SQL y la herramienta de modelado multidimensional Pentaho, presentó buena aceptación por parte de los directivos del turismo en Cotopaxi y contribuye a la toma de decisiones de los empresarios a nivel de atractivo turístico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcienciaDigitalSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207